|
The cello and piano have
long since been regarded as complementary instruments, and the
two combine to stunning effect with the release of this 1997
album by Norwegian pianist
Ketil Bjørnstad and
American cellist David Darling.
Darling is no stranger to
such collaborations, having worked with Canadian pianist and
inaugural Narada artist Michael Jones on a number of projects in
the late 80s. Bjørnstad, meanwhile, is better known for his jazz
compositions, and this work is definitely a departure from his
usual territory. The pianist is, however, classically trained,
studying in London, Paris and Oslo.
It was whilst recording the
quieter moments of this album's predecessor, ‘The Sea’ (in
Bjørnstad's words, music that was "often raging") that creative
opportunities for developing more sedate music came to light.
The approach Bjørnstad took was to study music from
the late renaissance, in particular that of English composer William Byrd and
composer, organist and choir-boy Orlando Gibbons, and to try and ‘translate’ this into a modern
idiom. However, as Bjørnstad points out, "Byrd was to inspire
specifically only Parts I and III, and Gibbons Part XII....
Byrd's bright ‘Qui Passé’ posted a direction, yes. Then the
music began to flow."
The end product, therefore,
is an album with classical moments, but is otherwise difficult
to define. Contemporary Instrumental would seem to be the best
description.
What I like most about this
album is the respective roles the piano and cello take. The
cello usually serves to embellish the melody from the piano and,
although its presence is felt, it is never overwhelming. The
piano is the instrument in charge here.
The track titles- simply
Roman Numerals- offer no hint as to the inspiration behind each
track or what is happening; that is left entirely to the listener.
The CD opens with the
renaissance-inspired ‘I’. Calming, sedate music. The cello
actually has a greater role in this composition, partnering the piano
with glorious results. The piece sets the high
standard for what awaits the listener.
One of my favourite tracks
is ‘II’. Minimalist piano combined with exquisite cello playing,
the cello really adding atmosphere to the piece. It is simply gorgeous.
The third track is more of
a period piece. It is short, almost hymn-like.
Definitely my favourite
track on the entire album is ‘IV’. Assuming The River is its
meaning in the literal sense rather than being representative of
the symbolic journey of life, the river here is in full flow,
heading perhaps towards a destructive waterfall. This is one of
those pieces which is totally enhanced by the presence of both
instruments, and I don't think would work nearly as well with
solo instrumentation. With the piano capturing the rapid movement of
the water downstream, the cello serves to add an element of
imminent danger, of risk, giving the piece a feeling of
uneasiness. It is a simply wonderful track that succeeds at
every level.
‘V’ starts off very darkly.
Foreboding in fact. After around 1:30, the piece changes, and
just as a river might evolve and change its path, so does this
track. Around a minute and a half later, the listen is
returned to the deep, deep notes from both instruments. All is
not well! And it is this constant changing of mood that makes
this piece gripping from start to finish. Dare the listener
imagine what might be happening?
Another of my favourite
tracks comes in the form of ‘VI’. The waters are calmer here. As
I listen, I can imagine the light from the morning sun
dancing and glistening like a thousand jewels from the steady flow of crystal-like water. This
really is a beautiful piece.
The seventh track is a
length piece, quite mournful in feel. Dark and brooding.
Unsettling in some respects, it is nonetheless very
atmospheric.
I love the unorthodox cello
playing by Darling during track eight. The piece quickly becomes
more intense. The cello takes more of lead here than in other
pieces. The track is basically devoid of melody and is more of
an atmospheric sound-scape. It's unusual, challenging and yet
rather engaging. I wouldn't be surprised if this had a larger
degree of improvisation than in other pieces. Refreshingly
original, it's out there on its own!
Track ‘IX’ is another
lengthy composition and, whilst still retaining an element of
darkness, is lighter in tone. The piano is back in charge.
The tenth track is more
buoyant- uplifting almost! This comes as a welcome relief to the
listener, and the ensuing piece is a melodic affair, lasting a
little over three minutes in duration. The waters are settled
once more. The danger has passed. All is well.
The album's penultimate
track, ‘XI’ has a very slow tempo and is very minimalist in
form. Perhaps the river has run its path. I love the spaces between
the notes. This really is a delightful piece of music, and one that should be savoured.
A very short track closes
the CD. This is the composition inspired by Orlando Gibbons. It is a
lovely way to end. The river's journey is complete.
Lovers of piano and cello
should definitely seek out this CD. The recording quality, in
keeping with ECM's reputation, is top-notch. Although both men
are credited on the cover, the compositions are written by
Bjornstad. Readers may be interested to know that the album was
recorded in June 1996 in Oslo, Norway, and was engineered by Jan
Erik Kongshaug and produced by Manfred Eicher. The two musicians
went on to produce a further collaboration ‘Epigraphs’ in 2000.
I spotted this CD by chance
in HMV at Oxford Circus in London. I was curious and, as I was
unable to listen to samples, phoned a friend who listened for me.
She, in turn, gave it her seal of approval and the purchase was
made. I am very glad I made
that call.
‘The River’ is a superb CD
from start to finish. A collaboration made in heaven.
S.C.
|